🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Fixed payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. POS. High Deductible Health Plan. HSA. FSA. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. Small Business Health Options Program. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Selecting the appropriate medical coverage for our business – or for households – appears to require demands advanced expertise in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

According to a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually for their health insurance (up 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to surpass $seventeen thousand for each worker by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently the government has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're getting closer since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. The existing system remains intact. How medical professionals get paid would change. Trust me, they will adjust.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays about five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer pays about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem like a lot? Unless you compare that with what the typical US resident spends. I know dozens of businesses that are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs to their healthcare costs. Remember that with inclusive programs, these contributions include pension plans, sick pay, maternity leave and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the difference decreases.

Execution for America

For America, a national health premium would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a system already established. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. This includes both worker and employer contribution. Similar to many our government's defense, IT, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Advantages for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford better plans. It would render administration much easier (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to retirement and Medicare taxes, instead of individual transactions to benefit firms and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler for us to budget our yearly costs, rather than enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of bargaining with major insurers that we must do every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would certainly be less liability for employers as we no longer have access to our employees' medical records for weighing risks and different options.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as possible. However I recognize that government has a significant role in society, including national security to funding essential systems. Providing healthcare for everyone via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of American employees and generate half the economic output. It enables for workers to be healthier, come to work more often and be more productive.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. But with rising medical expenses we've seen recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. And I realize that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes can be readily adopted. However extending universal Medicare, despite the additional taxes required, would remain a superior and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses but providing access for all citizens.

Time for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to reduce our own arrogance. Our healthcare system isn't exceptional. We rank well below many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot in this current situation could be that we undertake a hard look in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.